The article was very interesting because it goes along with
the same ideas I have in regards to social media. Words can cut like a knife or
haunt you like a ghost and people are learning the hard way about this basic
rule of thumb. Its one thing for a teen age girl to start a blog about her life
in highschool, love for Justin Beiber and everything pop culture, but it’s
another for a “reputable” news outlet to blog. In my opinion it’s a bit
socially irresponsible and reckless for FOX, ABC etc. to blog, they are
supposed to deliver accurate nonbiased news to the people. Call me old fashion,
but I like my news straight with no chaser, not this fancy pants technically
driven stuff I see nowadays. But like anything in the business world, it’s
about the bottom line. These news outlets have taken on the idea to roll with
the times, or get rolled over. They have to stay on top of what’s new and go
along with it, even if it’s against their better judgment.
After reading the article, Dana Hull's (2006) article, Blogging
Between the LinesI realized that there isn’t much that can be done to
fact check and or monitor what bloggers are writing. I’m VERY surprised that
bloggers haven’t been sued due to the sometimes inaccurate or defaming things
they write. Like many social media outlets, blogging reaches millions, but
doesn’t realize the impact it has on the world good, bad or indifferent. I
think it’s a shame that 2 of the top 5 blogs are “gossip” blogs (TMZ and Perez
Hilton). I like a little insight into celebrities’ lives, but these sites take
it to a whole new level. I don’t agree with the invasion of the celebrities’
space and business, it’s horrible and at times dangerous what these people will
do to get a picture of celebrities and post about their lives. Has no one
learned from the death of Princess Diana?
No comments:
Post a Comment